Friday, May 27, 2011

W 44

44.  Charny asks:   And if the men at arms mentioned above gain much and lose nothing, those of the city who remained to guard and defend it demand a share, and those who rode out say no.   Many good arguments are made on either side.   How will it be judged by the law of arms?  

1 comment:

  1. Rossbach p. 160 n. 78 cites a marginal note from ms. M:
    "Response: nulle rien n'i auront cil de la ville qui sont demoures se convenant par avant n'estoit que tout fust en bustin, mais est bien drois et raison."